Difference between revisions of "Earthwork Fences in New Zealand"
(Created page with " == Earthwork Fences in New Zealand == right|thumbOwen Wiles, Lynda Walter, Neville Richie, Karen Greig and John Coster. 2012. Memoir 11, Whakatane and District...") |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Earthwork Fences in New Zealand == | == Earthwork Fences in New Zealand == | ||
| − | [[File:Earth|right|thumb]]Owen Wiles, Lynda Walter, Neville | + | [[File:Earth.jpg|right|thumb]]'''Owen Wiles, Lynda Walter, Neville Ritchie, Karen Greig and John Coster. 2012. Memoir 11, Whakatane and District Historical Society. 43pp. |
| + | ''' | ||
| + | Available from the society, PO Box 203 Whakatane, 3158. ISBN 1 86940 315 0 | ||
| − | + | The greater part of this memoir is an account of earthwork fences in the Aotea / Kawhia area contributed by [[Wilkes Owen|Owen Wilkes]], analysing their form. locations, functions and dates. It includes a gazetteer of the sites. The remaining authors have contributed an introduction, which places the sites considered by Wilkes in a national context and have undertaken light editing on the Wilkes report, which was originally intended only as a site record supplement, but which they thought - rightly - was worthy of wider circulation. | |
[[Category:Books]][[Category:2012_Books]] | [[Category:Books]][[Category:2012_Books]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Waikato]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:51, 17 July 2012
Earthwork Fences in New Zealand
Owen Wiles, Lynda Walter, Neville Ritchie, Karen Greig and John Coster. 2012. Memoir 11, Whakatane and District Historical Society. 43pp.
Available from the society, PO Box 203 Whakatane, 3158. ISBN 1 86940 315 0
The greater part of this memoir is an account of earthwork fences in the Aotea / Kawhia area contributed by Owen Wilkes, analysing their form. locations, functions and dates. It includes a gazetteer of the sites. The remaining authors have contributed an introduction, which places the sites considered by Wilkes in a national context and have undertaken light editing on the Wilkes report, which was originally intended only as a site record supplement, but which they thought - rightly - was worthy of wider circulation.
