Difference between revisions of "Dug to Death"

From Archaeopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Dug to Death)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Well is it a spoof? A who-dunit set in an excavation in Victoria (thinly diguised Queenstown), Central Otago undertaken by the University of Invercargill it is clearly fiction at one level - but it is also a primer on underaking excavations. Praetzellis has spent some time here so the local references are knowing. The New Zealand English glossary is a hoot.
 
Well is it a spoof? A who-dunit set in an excavation in Victoria (thinly diguised Queenstown), Central Otago undertaken by the University of Invercargill it is clearly fiction at one level - but it is also a primer on underaking excavations. Praetzellis has spent some time here so the local references are knowing. The New Zealand English glossary is a hoot.
  
Ian Barber has reviewed it in Archaeology in New Zealand 2005 48(4):256-58.
+
[[Barber Ian|Ian Barber]] has reviewed it in Archaeology in New Zealand 2005 48(4):256-58.
  
 
There are other reviews linked [http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=JxVdTpPvrNoC&sitesec=reviews&source=gbs_navlinks_s here.]
 
There are other reviews linked [http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=JxVdTpPvrNoC&sitesec=reviews&source=gbs_navlinks_s here.]

Revision as of 17:36, 11 January 2011

Dug to Death

DugtoDeath.jpg

'A tale of archaeological method and mayhem'.

Adrian Praetzellis, 2003 Altamira Press, Walnut Creek.

Well is it a spoof? A who-dunit set in an excavation in Victoria (thinly diguised Queenstown), Central Otago undertaken by the University of Invercargill it is clearly fiction at one level - but it is also a primer on underaking excavations. Praetzellis has spent some time here so the local references are knowing. The New Zealand English glossary is a hoot.

Ian Barber has reviewed it in Archaeology in New Zealand 2005 48(4):256-58.

There are other reviews linked here.