Difference between revisions of "Kitsch"
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
[[Image:Boxback.jpg|thumb|left|The back.]] | [[Image:Boxback.jpg|thumb|left|The back.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Box.jpg|thumb|left|More matches.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Box1.jpg|thumb|left|Still more.]] | ||
[[Image:Ewart.jpg|framed|left|Dorothy Ewart pottery dish.]] | [[Image:Ewart.jpg|framed|left|Dorothy Ewart pottery dish.]] |
Revision as of 08:40, 10 May 2010
Archaeological Kitsch
Archaeological items of iconic status become the subject of modern copies and re-use of the imagery. New Zealand items are not immune.
Maori
Rock drawings seem to have been particularly prone to this - borrowings appearing on fabrics, glassware, ceramics,postage stamps and even matchboxes. O'Regan discusses this use in the context of cultural property[1].
|
Colonial
Barry Curtis Park in South Auckland has volcanic rock walls, reconstructed from a nearby farm site. The unfortunate result is what happens when landscape architecture captures archaeological reconstruction.
|
References
- ↑ O'Regan, G. 2008 The shifting place of Ngai Tahu rock art. in Sue O'Connor, Geoffrey Clark, Foss Leach (Eds), Islands of inquiry : colonisation, seafaring and the archaeology of maritime landscapes. Terra Australis 29 Accessed at http://epress.anu.edu.au/terra_australis/ta29/pdf/ch26.pdf