Difference between revisions of "Kitsch"
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Rock drawings seem to have been particularly prone to this - borrowings appearing on fabrics, glassware and stamps. | Rock drawings seem to have been particularly prone to this - borrowings appearing on fabrics, glassware and stamps. | ||
− | O'Regan discusses this use in the context of cultural property<ref>O'Regan, G 2008 The shifting place of Ngai Tahu rock art. in Sue O'Connor, Geoffrey Clark, Foss Leach (Eds)Islands of inquiry : colonisation, seafaring and the archaeology of maritime landscapes Terra Australis 29</ref>. | + | O'Regan discusses this use in the context of cultural property<ref>O'Regan, G 2008 The shifting place of Ngai Tahu rock art. in Sue O'Connor, Geoffrey Clark, Foss Leach (Eds) Islands of inquiry : colonisation, seafaring and the archaeology of maritime landscapes Terra Australis 29</ref>. |
Revision as of 07:58, 4 March 2010
Archaeological Kitsch
Archaeological items of iconic status become the subject of modern copies and re-use of the imagery. New Zealand items are not immune.
Maori
Rock drawings seem to have been particularly prone to this - borrowings appearing on fabrics, glassware and stamps. O'Regan discusses this use in the context of cultural property[1].
|
Colonial
Barry Curtis Park in south Auckland has volcanic rock walls, reconstructed from a nearby farm site. The unfortunate result is what happens when landscape architecture captures archaeological reconstruction.
|
References
- ↑ O'Regan, G 2008 The shifting place of Ngai Tahu rock art. in Sue O'Connor, Geoffrey Clark, Foss Leach (Eds) Islands of inquiry : colonisation, seafaring and the archaeology of maritime landscapes Terra Australis 29