Difference between revisions of "Future Archaeology"

From Archaeopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with " == Future Archaeology == Science fiction often invokes archaeology. Even before science fiction an early invocation of a future New Zealand archaeologist was that of Lord Ma...")
 
Line 12: Line 12:
 
The idea was not entirely original(see Colenso 1882)<ref>A FEW REMARKS ON THE HACKNEYED QUOTATION OF "MACAULAY'S NEW ZEALANDER."
 
The idea was not entirely original(see Colenso 1882)<ref>A FEW REMARKS ON THE HACKNEYED QUOTATION OF "MACAULAY'S NEW ZEALANDER."
 
By W. Colenso, F.L.S. [Read before the Hawke's Bay Philosophical Institute, 12th June, 1882.]- on line at http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/tei-Stout65-t2-body-d2.html accessed July 2014</ref> and the quotation has been the subject of other essayists <ref>  </ref>
 
By W. Colenso, F.L.S. [Read before the Hawke's Bay Philosophical Institute, 12th June, 1882.]- on line at http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/tei-Stout65-t2-body-d2.html accessed July 2014</ref> and the quotation has been the subject of other essayists <ref>  </ref>
 +
 +
''References'''
 +
<references />

Revision as of 21:44, 8 July 2014

Future Archaeology

Science fiction often invokes archaeology. Even before science fiction an early invocation of a future New Zealand archaeologist was that of Lord Macaulay (1840)[1].

"And she may still exist in undiminished vigour when some traveller from New Zealand shall, in the midst of a vast solitude, take his stand on a broken arch of London Bridge to sketch the ruins of St. Paul's."

Clearly the sketcher must be an archaeologist and in 1840 must have been conceived of as being a Maori New Zealander.

The quote is from an essay about the Catholic Church ("she" in this case)and Macaulay was using the idea to emphasise - despairingly - the persistence of that church. His point was to exaggerate that persistence rather than to explore the idea of a Maori archaeologist in the future - but still the idea is there.

The idea was not entirely original(see Colenso 1882)[2] and the quotation has been the subject of other essayists [3]

References'

  1. Thomas Babington Macaulay 1840 Essay, On Ranck's "History of the Popes". Edinburgh Review
  2. A FEW REMARKS ON THE HACKNEYED QUOTATION OF "MACAULAY'S NEW ZEALANDER." By W. Colenso, F.L.S. [Read before the Hawke's Bay Philosophical Institute, 12th June, 1882.]- on line at http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/tei-Stout65-t2-body-d2.html accessed July 2014