Difference between revisions of "Kitsch"
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Fairburn and Schoon have [http://dnzb.govt.nz/ Dictionary of New Zealand Biography] entries. | Fairburn and Schoon have [http://dnzb.govt.nz/ Dictionary of New Zealand Biography] entries. | ||
{{wikipedia|Theodorus_Johannes_Schoon}} | {{wikipedia|Theodorus_Johannes_Schoon}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Gate.jpg|framed|left|An execrable souvenir of the 1940 Centennial Exhibition. Perhaps not archaeological - a Birmingham made badge representing the Hinemoa and Tutanekai gateway at the Model Pa, Whakarewarewa. It doesn't include the kiwi! [http://www.nzmuseums.co.nz/account/3064/object/1168 The gateway] itself is an example of bowdlerisation of Maori carving.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
]] | ]] | ||
Revision as of 09:09, 27 March 2010
Archaeological Kitsch
Archaeological items of iconic status become the subject of modern copies and re-use of the imagery. New Zealand items are not immune.
Maori
Rock drawings seem to have been particularly prone to this - borrowings appearing on fabrics, glassware and stamps. O'Regan discusses this use in the context of cultural property[1].
|
Colonial
Barry Curtis Park in south Auckland has volcanic rock walls, reconstructed from a nearby farm site. The unfortunate result is what happens when landscape architecture captures archaeological reconstruction.
|
References
- ↑ O'Regan, G. 2008 The shifting place of Ngai Tahu rock art. in Sue O'Connor, Geoffrey Clark, Foss Leach (Eds), Islands of inquiry : colonisation, seafaring and the archaeology of maritime landscapes. Terra Australis 29 Accessed at http://epress.anu.edu.au/terra_australis/ta29/pdf/ch26.pdf