Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ambury Regional Park"

From Archaeopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
The image is uploaded to Archaeopedia as Ambury.jpg - sorry not very good, pre-digital - I will have the photo print somewhere and will try for a better scan.
 
The image is uploaded to Archaeopedia as Ambury.jpg - sorry not very good, pre-digital - I will have the photo print somewhere and will try for a better scan.
  
I have emailed Simon Bickler a conservation plan I did for part of the park - remind him to send it on to you.
+
I have emailed Simon Bickler a conservation plan I did for part of the park - he will have sent it on.
  
 
It has some more historic information relevant to the archaeology.
 
It has some more historic information relevant to the archaeology.
  
I think the claim ''Ambury Regional Park is the only place where publicly owned Maori Rock Art can be found''. Is wrong - I suggest a ''rare place''.
+
I think the claim ''Ambury Regional Park is the only place where publicly owned Maori Rock Art can be found'' is wrong - I suggest a ''rare place''.
  
 
Your references should have the normal reference text as well as the link.
 
Your references should have the normal reference text as well as the link.
 +
 +
Perhaps some category links? (bottom of the page).

Revision as of 12:44, 22 February 2010

Here is a pic of Ambury

Ambury.jpg

The image is uploaded to Archaeopedia as Ambury.jpg - sorry not very good, pre-digital - I will have the photo print somewhere and will try for a better scan.

I have emailed Simon Bickler a conservation plan I did for part of the park - he will have sent it on.

It has some more historic information relevant to the archaeology.

I think the claim Ambury Regional Park is the only place where publicly owned Maori Rock Art can be found is wrong - I suggest a rare place.

Your references should have the normal reference text as well as the link.

Perhaps some category links? (bottom of the page).