Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ambury Regional Park"
m (Talk:Ambury regional park moved to Talk:Ambury Regional Park) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The image is uploaded to Archaeopedia as Ambury.jpg - sorry not very good, pre-digital - I will have the photo print somewhere and will try for a better scan. | The image is uploaded to Archaeopedia as Ambury.jpg - sorry not very good, pre-digital - I will have the photo print somewhere and will try for a better scan. | ||
| − | I have emailed Simon Bickler a conservation plan I did for part of the park - | + | I have emailed Simon Bickler a conservation plan I did for part of the park - he will have sent it on. |
It has some more historic information relevant to the archaeology. | It has some more historic information relevant to the archaeology. | ||
| − | I think the claim ''Ambury Regional Park is the only place where publicly owned Maori Rock Art can be found'' | + | I think the claim ''Ambury Regional Park is the only place where publicly owned Maori Rock Art can be found'' is wrong - I suggest a ''rare place''. |
Your references should have the normal reference text as well as the link. | Your references should have the normal reference text as well as the link. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Perhaps some category links? (bottom of the page). | ||
Latest revision as of 14:59, 20 March 2010
Here is a pic of Ambury
The image is uploaded to Archaeopedia as Ambury.jpg - sorry not very good, pre-digital - I will have the photo print somewhere and will try for a better scan.
I have emailed Simon Bickler a conservation plan I did for part of the park - he will have sent it on.
It has some more historic information relevant to the archaeology.
I think the claim Ambury Regional Park is the only place where publicly owned Maori Rock Art can be found is wrong - I suggest a rare place.
Your references should have the normal reference text as well as the link.
Perhaps some category links? (bottom of the page).
