Difference between revisions of "Dug to Death"
(→Dug to Death) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[http://www.sonoma.edu/users/p/praetzel/ Adrian Praetzellis], 2003 Altamira Press, Walnut Creek. | [http://www.sonoma.edu/users/p/praetzel/ Adrian Praetzellis], 2003 Altamira Press, Walnut Creek. | ||
| − | Well is it a spoof? A who-dunit set in an excavation in Victoria (thinly diguised Queenstown), Central Otago undertaken by the University of Invercargill it is clearly fiction at one level - but it is also a primer on underaking excavations. Praetzellis has spent some time | + | Well is it a spoof? A who-dunit set in an excavation in Victoria (thinly diguised Queenstown), Central Otago undertaken by the University of Invercargill it is clearly fiction at one level - but it is also a primer on underaking excavations. Praetzellis has spent some time in New Zealand so the local references are knowing. The New Zealand English glossary is a hoot. |
| − | Ian Barber has reviewed it in Archaeology in New Zealand 2005 48(4):256-58. | + | [[Barber Ian|Ian Barber]] has reviewed it in Archaeology in New Zealand 2005 48(4):256-58. |
There are other reviews linked [http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=JxVdTpPvrNoC&sitesec=reviews&source=gbs_navlinks_s here.] | There are other reviews linked [http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=JxVdTpPvrNoC&sitesec=reviews&source=gbs_navlinks_s here.] | ||
| − | [[Category:Spoof_Books]] | + | [[Category:Spoof_Books]] [[Category:Fiction]] |
Latest revision as of 22:05, 16 August 2019
Dug to Death
'A tale of archaeological method and mayhem'.
Adrian Praetzellis, 2003 Altamira Press, Walnut Creek.
Well is it a spoof? A who-dunit set in an excavation in Victoria (thinly diguised Queenstown), Central Otago undertaken by the University of Invercargill it is clearly fiction at one level - but it is also a primer on underaking excavations. Praetzellis has spent some time in New Zealand so the local references are knowing. The New Zealand English glossary is a hoot.
Ian Barber has reviewed it in Archaeology in New Zealand 2005 48(4):256-58.
There are other reviews linked here.
