Difference between revisions of "Dug to Death"

From Archaeopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Dug to Death)
(Dug to Death)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
[http://www.sonoma.edu/users/p/praetzel/ Adrian Praetzellis], 2003 Altamira Press, Walnut Creek.
 
[http://www.sonoma.edu/users/p/praetzel/ Adrian Praetzellis], 2003 Altamira Press, Walnut Creek.
  
Well is it a spoof? A who-dunit set in an excavation in Victoria (thinly diguised Queestown), Central Otago undertaken by the University of Invercargill it is clearly fiction at one level - but it is also a primer on underaking excavations. Praetzellis has spent some time here so the local references are knowing. The New Zealand English glossary is a hoot.
+
Well is it a spoof? A who-dunit set in an excavation in Victoria (thinly diguised Queenstown), Central Otago undertaken by the University of Invercargill it is clearly fiction at one level - but it is also a primer on underaking excavations. Praetzellis has spent some time here so the local references are knowing. The New Zealand English glossary is a hoot.
  
 
Ian Barber has reviewed it in Archaeology in New Zealand 2005 48(4):256-58.
 
Ian Barber has reviewed it in Archaeology in New Zealand 2005 48(4):256-58.

Revision as of 14:26, 11 December 2009

Dug to Death

DugtoDeath.jpg

'A tale of archaeological method and mayhem'.

Adrian Praetzellis, 2003 Altamira Press, Walnut Creek.

Well is it a spoof? A who-dunit set in an excavation in Victoria (thinly diguised Queenstown), Central Otago undertaken by the University of Invercargill it is clearly fiction at one level - but it is also a primer on underaking excavations. Praetzellis has spent some time here so the local references are knowing. The New Zealand English glossary is a hoot.

Ian Barber has reviewed it in Archaeology in New Zealand 2005 48(4):256-58.

There are other reviews linked here.